迈克布朗将如何分配球队的进攻权呢？
湖人后卫科比布莱恩特充满自信的为球队的进攻权构造了一张明确的宏伟蓝图。
在赛季告别会上他表示：我想要投篮，我们都知道这一点，而加索尔也想得到球权，所以总体上他排在第二名，至于拜纳姆，他要排在之后，就是这么简单！
如果就是这么简单的话，这就不是新闻了！毕竟，在08到09赛季拜纳姆因为缺少出手权曾抱怨他应该成为进攻首选而加索尔排在其次！科比说的也没错，毕竟他仍是湖人的老大联盟最好的球员之一，加索尔2011季后赛糟糕的表现并不能否定他仍旧是联盟最有效率的前锋之一！但是主教练已经变成了迈克布朗。究竟他会怎样合理分配并执行球队的进攻权呢？
毕竟，科比公开发表与拜纳姆有关自己下赛季在球队中进攻角色的不同意见才过去一天！
我希望下赛季承担更多责任，拜纳姆在赛季告别会上表示他要努力成为球队更重要的角色！
布朗的进攻理念暗示着他会保留一些三角进攻战术，他说，科比会在他舒服的位置自己持球进攻或接球得分！但是他会融入进来更多的挡拆配合，要把加索尔和拜纳姆打造成马刺时代的邓肯和罗宾逊！布朗想要球队提速，我们需要从后场到前场在前3到4秒内完成以便更快的发动进攻，所以相比以前节奏快一点！
目前来说球权是怎么分配的呢？布朗提供了一个理论上听起来不错但还需要在比赛上试验。这由球员们在场上的表现决定，布朗说：我不能替他们得分，我不会偏向加索尔，即使他有一个很好的状态能够砍下35，6分但他的确是我们的领袖，如果他说：我们必须慢下来让科比传球，我们就会执行这个战术！球员们只是想用最好的方式来帮助球队获胜！
即使是科比，拜纳姆以及布朗希望的进攻意愿，随着比赛的深入不同的观点就会暴露出问题，而这正是湖人在每个赛季都需要解决的！
科比曾表示：尽管来防我吧！但这证明并不完全合理！当湖人的内线打的不够有侵略性或者队友不能创造自己得分的机会时科比理所应当的该选择大量出手。但科比不应该在进攻很流畅的时候选择大量出手。科比应该给内线以信心并注意自己的伤病。他同时得让队员们对自己有一个合理的定位！
加索尔一直强调湖人应该多考虑内线，这理论上没错但现实却不一定是这样。当科比一直打铁或者拜纳姆主要承担防守重任时他理应多出手。但是当科比连续得分或者拜纳姆在禁区更有效率时他应该少出手！
拜纳姆在防守端的突出表现掩盖了他有限的进攻端角色！他经常抱怨内线的球权太少了。在加索尔打的不够强硬时拜纳姆理应多出手，反之，他鲜有出手机会。当他抢下进攻篮板时就会获得多的出手机会，而当外线射手有手感时他就会被忽略。
所以，布朗说决定出手权顺序是不明智的，因为不根据球场的实际情况而严格执行那个计划会让球员们感到困惑！但完全没有出手优先权也是不可取的。
科比在上赛季57场的胜利中场均出手18.93次，而在失利的25场比赛中场均出手增加到22.4次。让科比在命中率有49.3%的低位进攻，而不让他选择命中率只有39.6%的持球进攻并不一定能让湖人的战绩更加出色！
加索尔在湖人赢球时场均出手14.14次，输球时场均出手只有12.56次。这也就为球队或加索尔在输球时如何准确定位带来了问题！尽管加索尔在背打时的命中率只有43.3%，但这些背打只占他所有进攻手段的39.3%。尽管加索尔最有效的的攻击方式是勾手（72.5%的命中率）和定点跳投（55.7%的命中率），这两个区域的390次出手还是比背打的620出手少了很多！
拜纳姆在湖人赢球时场均出手8.75次，输球时场均出手7.38次。当然，这两组数据几乎一样，也在一定程度上表明了拜纳姆愿意接受防守的角色。当加索尔和科比手感不好时拜纳姆的出手次数并没有明显的增加！
唯一让这件事变得复杂的就是：当不打三角进攻时控卫费舍尔和布雷克会扮演什么样的角色！
当球队有许多可以控球的人时，他们三个的进攻权就几乎均等了，小个球员会不停的变换，布朗解释说：这和过去没有什么大的不同，因为过去我们就有很多人可以控球，包括拉马尔奥多姆！我们进攻最重要的事情在于时间的把握，我们需要在3到4秒内把球从后场运到前场，这样我们才能在24秒结束前有两到三次甚至四次的战术发动进攻，所以相比以往来说我们的节奏要快一点！
如果科比可以无球跑动，拜纳姆和加索尔两个大个在内线努力的肉搏扯开更大的空间让外线有更好的投射和拼抢机会，这样才能达到布朗的攻守不平衡的目标！布朗怎么让球员们接受并坚持执行这样的进攻战术是成功的关键！
=====================================================
How should Mike Brown determine the pecking order of the Lakers' offense? How should Mike Brown determine the pecking order of the Lakers' offense?
June 28, 2011 | 12:24 pm
--Mark Medina
With a booming and confident voice, Lakers guard Kobe Bryant provided a clear blueprint on how the Lakers' offense should look.
"I'm going to shoot the ball," he said during his exit interview. "We all know that. Pau [Gasol] is going to get his touches. So he's No. 2 in command. So [Andrew Bynum] has to fall in line with that. It's pretty simple."
Oh, if only it were that simple. This revelation isn't anything new. After all, Bryant famously mentioned that "I eat first and Pau eats second" during the 2008-09 season when Bynum complained about lacking touches. Bryant's argument isn't problematic. After all, he remains one of the best players in the game and the Lakers' best player, while Gasol's poor 2011 playoff performance doesn't wipe away the fact that he's one of the league's most efficient power forwards. But what is new is Coach Mike Brown. How exactly will Brown enforce the pecking order of the team's offense, and in what instances will he find a certain pecking order most appropriate?
After all, it was only a day before Bryant's bold proclamations that Bynum envisioned a much different reality involving his offensive role in the 2011-12 season.
"I'm coming back next year expecting to be a bigger part of the team," Bynum said during his exit interview. "I'm going to work to be a bigger part of the team."
Brown's overall vision on how his offense will run provides a few clues but the picture remains incomplete. There only be "bits and pieces" of the triangle offense remaining, he has said. Brown wants Bryant to get shots in his "sweet spots" with a mix of on- and off-ball movement. He wants a system similar to the one San Antonio ran when Brown was an assistant from 2000 to 2003, substituting Gasol and Bynum for the roles attached to Tim Duncan and David Robinson and involving receiving touches in the high post and running pick-and-rolls. Brown wants the team to "attack the clock" by getting the ball past the time line and set in its offense within the first three or four seconds of the shot clock, enabling the Lakers to run their offense earlier and require them to execute at a faster pace.
But as far as how the pecking order will go? Brown provided an answer that sounds good in theory but one that will be tested once the Lakers actually compete.
"It’s going to determine itself, with how well guys play," Brown said. "I can’t score for any of them. So if they go out and show they can do something, I’m not going to go to Pau if he’s having a good night, if he’s going for 35, 36, and he’s leading us and say “No, no no, you’ve got to slow down and let Kobe pass you.” We’re just going to play the game, and our guys are going to play the game the best way to help this team win."
Even if what Bryant, Bynum and Brown offered as their vision of the offense mostly involves semantics, the differing views already posing a possible problem that could manifest over time once games actually start. It's something that the Lakers handled with large mounts of inconsistency for different reasons.
Bryant has often boasted, "I just take what the defense gives me," but that proved to be the simplistic version of a nuanced approached. He rightfully took a larger amount of shots when the Lakers' front line either didn't play aggressive enough or teammates seemed to passive to create their own shot. He wrongfully took a larger amount of a shots even when the rest of the offense clicked. Bryant rightfully facilitated when the Lakers' front line needed a confidence boost or when he wanted to better manage his injuries. He wrongfully facilitated when the Lakers' front line didn't establish proper post positioning.
Gasol often argued that the Lakers should view feeding the front line as the team's priority. That concept was never wrong in theory but he was often wrong in reality. He deserved more touches than Bryant when the latter's shooting was off. He deserved more touches when Bynum took large ownership of the Lakers' defense. But Gasol deserved fewer touches when Bryant went on a scoring spree or when Bynum proved more efficient inside than Gasol.
And though Bynum hid his frustrations about a limited offensive role by taking pride on the defensive end, he too often criticized the Lakers for not getting the ball inside enough. Bynum warranted more looks when Gasol clearly lacked aggression. Bynum warranted fewer opportunities when Gasol played efficiently. He warranted more looks when he grabbed offensive rebounds. And he warranted fewer looks when the Lakers' inconsistent outside shooters occasionally hit their stride.
So yes, Brown is correct when he argues it's wrong to determine a set pecking order because it leaves the Lakers too consumed with following that plan instead of actually recognizing what's happening on the floor. But it's incorrect to assume that will all sort itself out.
Bryant averaged 18.93 field-goal attempts in the Lakers' 57 regular-season wins, but averaged 22.4 attempts per game in the Lakers' 25 regular-season losses. But that also just sparks debate on whether the Lakers could've done a better job by allowing Bryant to post up, where he shot 49.3% according to Synergy Sports, as opposed to when he handled the ball, when he shot only 39.6%.
Gasol averaged 14.14 attempts in the Lakers' regular-season wins but attempted only 12.56 shots when the Lakers lost. But that also just raises further questions on whether the team and Gasol set himself in the proper spots in those losses. Even though Gasol shot only 43.3% while posting up, according to Synergy, those shots represented 39.3% of his total shots. Even though Gasol remained most effective off cuts (shooting 72.5%) and on spot-up jumpers (55.7%), the 390 combined shots in those two areas still fall short to the 620 jumpers he shot in post-up situations.
Bynum averaged 8.75 attempts in the Lakers' regular-season wins, and attempted 7.38 shots when the Lakers lost. Surely those numbers are pretty similar and partly reflect Bynum's willingness to play a mostly defensive role. But it's also revealing that Bynum's shots didn't increase much even when Bryant and Gasol weren't shooting well.
To perhaps make things even more complicated, this issue includes another wrinkle in how the point guard role for Derek Fisher and Steve Blake will evolve now that the offense won't feature much of the triangle.
“The one thing is it will be an equal-opportunity offense where the one, the two or the three can bring the ball up," Brown explained. "Because all the smalls are interchangeable. So it’s not going to be too much different, because in the past here they had multiple guys, even including Lamar [Odom], bring the ball up. But the one thing we like to emphasize is attacking the clock. We want to get the ball from the backcourt to the frontcourt within the first four seconds or so, so that we can get to a second, a third, and sometimes a fourth option without our backs being up against the shot clock. So we’d like to get the ball up the floor a little quicker than what we’ve done in the past.”
Ideally, Brown wants the offense structured so that defenses remain "off-balance" The Lakers would reach that goal if Bryant interchanges between moving on and off the ball, Gasol and Bynum provide a mix of inside presence to punish teams from doubling Bryant and to spread the floor and remaining supporting cast chip in with better outside shooting and better effort on hustle plays. But the success of that will mostly hinge on how well Brown gets the Lakers to consistently play those roles and show willingness to be adaptable to their pecking order. |
發表於 2011-7-9 07:19 AM
| 
